There it is again.
When I pull up the statistics for this blog, I find a curious and persistent phenomenon: The number of views per day is consistently higher on Sundays. What is that all about? And not only that, but the majority of the week’s views, over and over again, have been of a posting I did over a year and a half ago (January 2015), “Dis-confirming Data in Real Life”.
Dis-confirming data are present in life when our experiences do not appear to support current theory or our a priori assumptions. One example I gave in the 2015 posting was about my mother, who, in 1991, moved out of her long-time home into a nursing home here in Madison; when I offered to bring in some of her pieces of furniture to put in her room she had absolutely no wish to do that. Her response flew in the face of all the environmental and relocation literature that champions having familiar objects in one’s new space to make it seem more like home.
At the time of the January 2015 posting, I argued that dis-confirming data are not to be feared or avoided but rather they are to be “celebrated.” Instead of merely casting doubt on the original themes or theories, the evidence-to-the-contrary offers us deeper and richer understandings than would otherwise be possible. We need these dis-confirming data. For me, my mother’s response led to expanded ways of thinking about relocation, that bringing pieces of one’s prior home to a new location might feel like a violation of that previous home, that to bring familiar items into the new home could feel un-comforting rather than comforting.
So my questions are: Why does this bump in the statistics for blog views persistently occur on Sundays? And, what is the meaning of the recurring preponderance of views of the posting on dis-confirming data? Anyone?
And now I can’t resist sharing one more example of dis-confirming data. This one comes from my three-year experience in a program of restorative justice at a maximum security prison in Wisconsin.
I was leading a discussion with about 24 men, inmates in the prison, sitting in a circle, focusing on their everyday routines “inside the walls.” The discussion included asking the men to share ways that they had been able to make their days inside the prison more their own, more meaningful to them as individuals. For part of the discussion, I asked them to describe for me what their cells were like. What would I see if I visited them in their cells?
Theoretically, I was looking for them to describe ways that they had been able to incorporate personal elements in their cells — to make their cells feel more home-like and more “theirs.” And, in fact, that is primarily what they did describe: a box that was used as a small table, a rug on the floor, a dustpan made out of cardboard, sage and other Native American symbols on the wall. But then . . . at one point, one of the men described a very different way of making the cell “his own.”
This man told the group that he deliberately had never unpacked the boxes that he brought his things in when first coming to the prison. He said that he wanted to be ready to leave prison on a minute’s notice, if ever he should get the call. I came to understand this reluctance to unpack or to express himself in some personal way in the cell’s decor as his way of “owning” that cell. The cell was his holding spot. The cell was not a space that he wanted to make personal or homey. Perhaps his “readiness to leave on a moment’s notice” helped make his stay in the maximum security prison bearable. Perhaps that “readiness” gave him a modicum of hope for a future.
So, back to the two questions above: What is it about Sunday that leads to this consistently high number of views on the blog? And what is it about the dis-confirming data posting — from well over a year ago — that leads to it consistently being the most widely viewed? Anyone?